<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ChicagoParks.com reaches $10,100 at NameJet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://namebio.com/NameBioBlog/chicagoparkscom-reaches-10100-at-namejet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://NameBio.com/NameBioBlog/chicagoparkscom-reaches-10100-at-namejet/</link>
	<description>The Domain Sales Archive</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: DomainDaddy</title>
		<link>http://NameBio.com/NameBioBlog/chicagoparkscom-reaches-10100-at-namejet/#comment-689</link>
		<dc:creator>DomainDaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 12:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://NameBio.com/NameBioBlog/2008/05/16/chicagoparkscom-reaches-10100-at-namejet/#comment-689</guid>
		<description>whoever won the auction decided not to pay. It's back to public auction going for about 6k now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whoever won the auction decided not to pay. It&#8217;s back to public auction going for about 6k now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PARKS</title>
		<link>http://NameBio.com/NameBioBlog/chicagoparkscom-reaches-10100-at-namejet/#comment-657</link>
		<dc:creator>PARKS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 23:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://NameBio.com/NameBioBlog/2008/05/16/chicagoparkscom-reaches-10100-at-namejet/#comment-657</guid>
		<description>In my opinion, city/parks.com's are great GeoDomains with many angles of development potential. 

Was $10K too high? Obviously not too high for somebody out there. True domain values are always determined by the market. I'm very happy to hear about ChicagoParks.com selling for 10K because it will probably raise the value of all the other city/parks.com domains.

In the end, the site's value will be determined by how useful its development is. Go ChicagoParks.com!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, city/parks.com&#8217;s are great GeoDomains with many angles of development potential. </p>
<p>Was $10K too high? Obviously not too high for somebody out there. True domain values are always determined by the market. I&#8217;m very happy to hear about ChicagoParks.com selling for 10K because it will probably raise the value of all the other city/parks.com domains.</p>
<p>In the end, the site&#8217;s value will be determined by how useful its development is. Go ChicagoParks.com!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
