<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WindowsXP.com - Pulled from auction at NameJet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://namebio.com/NameBioBlog/windowsxpcom-pulled-from-auction-at-namejet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://NameBio.com/NameBioBlog/windowsxpcom-pulled-from-auction-at-namejet/</link>
	<description>The Domain Sales Archive</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 15:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Etab</title>
		<link>http://NameBio.com/NameBioBlog/windowsxpcom-pulled-from-auction-at-namejet/#comment-715</link>
		<dc:creator>Etab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 02:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://NameBio.com/NameBioBlog/2008/06/17/windowsxpcom-pulled-from-auction-at-namejet/#comment-715</guid>
		<description>Is it because Microsoft has the ability, know-how, and tenacity to fight back?

Absolutely. It's bad PR to auction off something that would fetch that much publicity once sold. A popular game title recently sold on NameJet with no action on NJ's part to remove the name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it because Microsoft has the ability, know-how, and tenacity to fight back?</p>
<p>Absolutely. It&#8217;s bad PR to auction off something that would fetch that much publicity once sold. A popular game title recently sold on NameJet with no action on NJ&#8217;s part to remove the name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
